Wednesday, May 06, 2009

The University of Mary Nicholson: My Mother

This Sunday is the Feast Day of All Mothers. Well, actually that isn’t the real title of the holiday, since Mother’s Day is a secular holiday. However, even though the Church failed, in all its wisdom, to think of it first, we do know and celebrate the importance of the sacred office of Mother. “Honor thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise…” (Ephesians 6:2).

I believe parenthood is a sacred office. Alexander Campbell, one of the founders of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) believed it was imperative that parents accept and fulfill their divine roll as teachers of the faith within their homes. His fervor for this model of Christian education led him to be look upon the Sunday School movement of the early 19th century and religious education in public schools with some concern. He was not necessarily opposed to those models of Christian education, but was keenly aware of the human propensity to abdicate these responsibilities to the Church and local communities. Our public schools have been burdened with teaching our children about sex, morals, discipline and matters of faith in the last century as we have become very much aware that in the vast majority of homes throughout our nation there is little focus on such topics.

Mother’s Day is not just a celebration of giving birth, but a celebration of the office of maternal teacher. One doesn’t need to have a biological or a “forever family” to fulfill the role of mother. However, for those who do, the responsibility of teaching the faith and molding young children into responsible adults is paramount. Throughout my own ministry, people have often complimented my undergraduate and graduate schools for their obvious success in teaching me Scripture and the foundations of the Christian faith. Sometimes, those who do not know me, will ask, "What school taught you the most about Scripture?" My response is, "The University of Mary Nicholson."

Yes, dear friends, each night after homework, my mother would pull out the Bible Flash Cards. Bible Flash Cards were those little note sized cards similar to the ones from which we learned our multiplication tables and verb conjugations. Computer software and those little "Kid Komputers" we see in Toy stores have replaced the ancient medium of Flash Cards, but the discipline can still be fruitful. When the Sunday School teacher assigned me the task of memorizing at least one of the four possible memory verses from that week's lesson, the University of Mary Nicholson required me to memorize them all. Of course, she always made it fun. For each verse I would get an ice cream cone or the privilege of drinking a Coke in place of milk with dinner. For those of you who know me, her success is apparent. Other topics of study where things like, "name the Patriarchs...and their wives," "list the fruits of the Spirit," "who were the three Kings of the unified Kingdom of Israel." Sure, some of the ladies in the neighborhood would critique such methods with comments like, "isn't it more important that little Isaac learn that God loves him," or "kids are forced to learn so much at school, requiring him to learn trivial things like the list of Patriarchs seems stupid." "The University of Mary Nicholson" was not deterred by such commentary and we forged on with the lessons of the week.

My studies began as a small child when she would read bedtime Bible stories to me. Sure, I liked to look at the pictures, but in the process of I was learning our heritage of faith. We would be driving down the road and I would see a pile of stones where a road crew was working and my Mother would retell me the story of Abraham building an altar to sacrifice his son, Isaac. That was one of my favorites as that was also my name. Interestingly, hearing about things like child sacrifice or being confused about what the word “sacrifice” meant didn’t emotionally scar me. She allowed me to live with questions. Not always knowing or understand the answers was a part of the learning process.

When I was in High School, the teaching continued. The Flash Cards were not used anymore and the style of faith education transitioned from content to application, but the teaching of the faith continued. Don't get me wrong, I rebelled. "Mom, this is juvenile, I don't want to think about these things." It was at those times that the Principal and Dean of Student Conduct would step in...my father, Billy Nicholson. "Your mother is supposed to teach you these things, now show her the proper respect."

Conversations about relationships, sex, morals, the benefits of hard work, sportsmanship, fair play, honor and respect all were taught within the paradigm of the faith. You see, it was those lessons about the Ten Commandments, the Patriarchs and their wives, the list of Kings, the Beatitudes, the Fruits of the Spirit that served as the foundation for application of the faith. I knew the basics, the foundations and it was strong enough to support the building of the next level of faith. Abstract thinking, application, reasoning and the ability to not only think, but to think theologically were all possible because I had memorized John 3:16, Ephesians 2:8-9 and Acts 2:38.

I have to be honest. When I was completing my studies in college and the professor would relate his point to the great Confessions of the Church with the Apostle Paul's themes in Romans, I understood what he was saying. My classmates, on the other hand, were at a disadvantage. Phrases and themes like "the Good Confession," "the Proverbial Woman," "the New Jerusalem," and "an Emmaus experience" were all very familiar to me, whereas those who had not attended "The University of (their Mother's name here)" sat with blank stares.

As a Minister who has served the Church as both licensed and ordained for 17 years, I now see the harvest of a generation for whom religious instruction was not present. My peers are now the parents. They have a deep desire to teach the faith to their children. They understand the importance of faith training in the home, but unfortunately, they don't know the faith themselves. I wouldn't be very good at teaching rocket science, because I don't know anything about rocket science. If my child wanted to learn about rocket science, I would have to turn them over to someone else. The same thing has happened to our children. We don't know the stories of the Bible, the history of the Church or the foundations of our faith, so we look to others to fill the void. Sunday School is helpful, but even Sunday School curriculum publishers have had to accommodate to both the level of Biblical knowledge as well as the time commitment of most Sunday School teachers across the nation. One publisher of Sunday School curriculum was quoted as saying, "Modern day Sunday School lessons are geared to a Sunday School teacher preparing for his or her lesson while driving to Church on Sunday morning."

There is much work to be done. Not only do we have to maintain the level of Christian education for our young people, but we also have to be attentive to the remedial instruction of our adults. We can't afford to wait. I suspect that my mother learned as much, if not more, from simply reading the bedtime Bible stories to me. I am certain that the Bible Flash Cards taught her the memory verses too. Granted, Bible Flash Cards are interactive, whereas "Kid Komputers" are not. My suggestion is to bag the "Kid Komputers" and dig the Flash Cards out of the Church Supply Room's bottom cabinet drawer. You must bring your Children to Sunday School and Church. The parents need to stay too. Your kids will learn what is important by watching the efforts of their parents. If Sunday School isn't important to the parents, it won't be important to them.

Churches too, need to remember that teaching themes of sacrifice are best done when the folks remember the story of Abraham and Isaac. Lessons on diligence in study and work are best learned when we remember Jesus' story of the men who built their houses on sand and on rock. Pastors can help. Sunday School teachers are vital. However, a good harvest of well informed, properly trained adult Christians require the selfless effort we have come to realize is essential in the divine office of Spiritual Mothers and Fathers.

T
his week, the Church and our secular society will appropriately celebrate the efforts and labor of the mothers and all women who are worthy of our honor for their sacrifice to love and serve. Thank your Moms for their gift of love to you. Thank those women in your life that taught you, disciplined you and helped make you the person you are today. Honor their labors and the memory of the mothers who have passed into eternity by making a covenant today. Pray with your children, read the Bible to them everyday, look for opportunities in every day life to relate life to our Christian faith. This Sunday, at our Church between 19th and 20th Streets on Winchester Avenue in Ashland, Kentucky, we will honor all who serve God’s family as spiritual mothers. Thanks be to God for the gift of Mothers.



Monday, May 04, 2009

Denominations, Non-Denominations and everything in between

On the front page of today's paper, the annual Prayer Walk in Greenup County was one of the lead stories. In the text of the article, the organizers said that everyone was invited because the Parade was "non-denominational." Now, my wife says that I am too particular about things, especially the correct use of words, though not necessarily grammer. For example, there is no such word as "irregardless." Even if there was such a word, it would be redundant since the prefix "ir" actually means "regardless" or "in spite of everything." Regardless, for a "particular" guy like me who reads, "everyone is invited...the event is non-denominational" is like reading "everyone is invited...the event is for women."

I guess it was Mrs. West, my fourth grade teacher, who first introduced me to the meaning of the word "denomination." It literally means, "of a name." The prefix "de" means "of" and "nomina" means "name." It typically was a word that assigned value as well as a name. For example, when one cashes one's paycheck, the bank tellers might say, "In what denominations would you like your cash?" I remember a bumper sticker popular in the 80's that read: The First Church of Elvis, we welcome all denominations but prefer 50s and 100s (as in the denomination of the currency). As our culture has gotten more and more casual, even our humor pokes fun at our having become conversational slovens (sloven: n. One who is habitually careless, especially in appearance or presentation. NOT one from Slovenia.) (Slovenia: n. A country in central Europe pop. 2,010,000).

With regard to churches or faith communities, it would seem that if your church has a name, it would have "denominated" itself. Of course, we popularly understand denominations as multiple congregations who associate with one another or are unified in efforts based upon belief or practice. For example, I am a clergyman in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). We are a denomination. Aside from having "named" ourselves, our congregations share in basic beliefs, of which, the essential and mandatory belief is, Jesus is the Christ. I am still unclear as to how that makes us different from other denominations. I think that even Roman Catholics believe that one. We share similar practices, such as baptism my immersion (not submersion...that's what submarines do) and the celebration of Holy Communion at least weekly.

"Denominational Church" is the "dirty" way many refer to the Churches that were once viewed as "Mainline Protestants." Mainline Protestants are essentially the Protestant denominations that greatly influenced the social and political fabric of the United States in its formative years. Presbyterians, Methodist, Baptists and Episcopalians all provided the leaders and basic cultural tenets upon which this nation was built. During the cultural revolution of the 1960's, many of these denominations found themselves on the wrong side of the issues. Their clergy and members marched with Civil Rights activists, were in solidarity with women's suffrage movements and supported the efforts by unions for better wages and working conditions. Many conservative clergy and members, that is, those who were opposed to African Americans voting, women receiving equal pay in the workforce or safe working conditions for our nation's labor force, formed new denominations that now promote themselves as non-denominational (adj. Not restricted to or associated with a religious denomination). I would have defined it as "not of a name or a no name Church." Parenthetically, I find it interesting when dictionaries define words by using the word's root. For example, nonliving: adj. That which is not living.

The Rev. Dr. Jerry Falwell of the famed Thomas Road Baptist Church once proclaimed "the Mainline Churches are now sidelined Churches. Amen?" Technically Baptists would be included in the Mainline designation as their heritage dates back to the formative years of our nation with the establishment of a Baptist State...yes dear friends, Rhode Island was originally founded as a State where Baptists could practice their faith and organize their communities without interference from other Christian denominations. You gotta love US History 101.

Non-denominational churches eventually became congregations that were truly independent and autonomous. Many of these kind of churches, unrestrained by policies, practices and leadership checks and balances, grew into what we generally call "mega churches." These congregations are a unique blend of contemporary evangelical doctrine, mixed with Pentecostal undertones and powered by culturally relevant methods, including a mix of self help sermons and Top-40 styled music. These congregations, including Saddleback Church and Willow Creek Church have given rise to a unique concept of multi-campus churches or what I would call, "mini denominations." Congregations will start either as an intentional effort by these mega churches or already established congregations will adopt the mega church produced methods, faith statements and curriculum. Generally, conversation about particular Christian beliefs are kept generic enough to appeal to many kinds of people who, although they may differ theologically, share similar social beliefs. These congregations may be populated by people who have vastly different opinions on Speaking in Tongues, Baptism and the Nature of Christ, but will be unified on social issues such as abortion, prayer in school and the definition of marriage. Their unique blend of style, format and research of demographic trends (Willow Creek's model was a direct result of the pastor's door to door interviews of what people wanted in a "church experience.") propelled them to the forefront of the battle for America's cultural context. These self described non-denominational Churches are now more organized and connected then the often criticized institutional, denominational or mainline churches (Methodists, Presbyterians, etc.).

Recently, churches like the 1.3 million member (5 million worldwide), 13,000 congregation strong "independent" Christian Church, affiliated with the North American Christian Convention (not my definition of independent) and the over 6,000 congregation strong Churches of Christ (the name identifying those congregations within the Restorationist Movement that do not use musical instruments...not my definition of independent) have promoted themselves as non-denominational. As an outsider to these two denominatio... uhhh...groups, it looks more like they are trying to capitalize on a phenomenon within the Christian sub-culture than an accurate portrayal of their identity. Incidentally, both of these groups were once affiliated with the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), born from the early 19th century revivalist movement led by Alexander Campbell and Barton Stone. The schism (n. A separation or division into factions) occurred when many Disciples of Christ congregations began conversation with the already established Mainline Churches on matters of mission, justice and ministry. This ecumenical (adj. Concerned with establishing or promoting unity among churches) gave rise to a new word. The word "interdenominational" (adj. Of or involving different religious denominations) became all the rage.

As time went on, the culturally appropriate way of referring to gatherings of people from different faiths for a common purpose, like a Prayer Walk, would be to refer to it as interdenominational. The problem is that if a Christian defines themselves as non-denominational they don't really have anything with which to "inter." However, if we call the gathering non-denominational, those of us who identify ourselves as spiritually formed by a denomination, would have to leave part of ourselves behind. I'm not sure how an Episcopalian could leave behind their understanding that the Church maintains its apostolic faith via the apostolic office of Bishop or a Presbyterian keeping herself in good order through adherence to the Westminster Confession. I think that is what I liked about the word "interdenominational." Everyone could bring their particularity but still unite for a common purpose. Still, non-denominationalists, which at this point in the article have become a denomination, demand unity of purpose on their terms alone. You may only unite with them if you agree to adhere to what they think is important, whatever that might be at the time or for the event. Those of us who are interdenominationalists, now an alliance of those of us who were sidelined by Dr. Falwell, wonder why we can't be who we are in a spirit of toleration.

Fundamentally, the two words express different ideologies of Christian unity. Non-denominationalism says we can be unified by ignoring or at least playing down those aspects of our identity that might be divisive. Interdenominationalism says we can be united by tolerating and, even at times, celebrating our differences as unique expressions of God's gift of diversity to His catholic (adj. Universal, [a] Of or relating to the universal Christian church. [b] Of or relating to the ancient undivided Christian church. [c] Of or relating to those churches that have claimed to be representatives of the ancient undivided church. [d] culturally understood as relating to the Roman Catholic Church) Church. I like that word "catholic" but I am afraid that article might be even more complicated than this one.

Saturday, May 02, 2009

Kentucky Derby Day

Today is the "high holy day" for all Kentuckians. It is the Kentucky Derby. Even when I have traveled in the Middle East and the locals discover I live in Kentucky, they respond, "Oh, Kentucky Derby, very good...Government is very bad, but Kentucky Derby very good." Of course, that is pretty much the general response of most folks in the Middle East. "Oh, America have Ronald McDonald...McDonald's Sundae very good...Government is very bad, McDonalds very good."
Anyway, so a former active member asked me a few weeks ago if I had a prayer for horse races. I honestly thought he was kidding. After all, he attends a Baptist Church in Lexington. Why would he a) read an already written prayer and b) surely he's not gambling. I politely chuckled and said, "Well no, no horse racing prayers." Several days later he attended a funeral I was officiating and asked me again if I knew of any prayers for horse racing. I remarked that maybe I could talk to one of my Roman Catholic or Episcopalian colleagues about it, they might have a prayer for horse racing. The next day an email arrived, "Do you have a prayer yet?" So, in honor of this Kentucky Tradition, here is a prayer for all of you who might be attending The Kentucky Derby.

Father of all creation, you have made all that is.
The majesty of your creation with stars dotting the sky,
the sun and the moon,
the grandeur of mountains and the vastness of seas
attest to your might.
Your Church teaches that in all of creation,
humans are made in your image.
We are humbled,
yet marvel at the beauty of another creature
that bears the grace of your hand.
Merciful God, may you be ever be praised
for creating the Thoroughbred Racehorse.
Its power and agility are combined in a competitive dance
we call The Kentucky Derby.
Father, I pray, first, for the safety of all horses and riders.
I ask that the spirit of competition linger in the air,
reminding us of its power to inspire to greatness.
And finally Father, in faithfulness to utilize my winnings
for the glory of your Kingdom, to alleviate the sufferings of the poor
and to contribute to the support of your holy Church,
I humbly implore you to remove all impediments
that might prevent (horse's name) to win, place or show.
If I have offended your holiness with such a request,
forgive me and account my zeal to a desire to enjoy the festive
gathering that has made this great Commonwealth
the focus of the world. Know, most merciful God,
that I will always bend my knee as my lips and my heart forever confess
that Jesus is Lord, for it is in his name I pray. Amen.

Well, with that, I kinda feel like General Patton's Chaplain. Good luck everyone because I know Church attendance will be low tomorrow. My folks will say, "Well Rev. Ike, Churchhill Downs does have the word 'Church' in it."